1. Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and Defendant C, D, E, F, and G’s principal lawsuit, and Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows: "Defendant B corporation" in the 3th 14th th 14th th th th th 14th th th th th 14th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th 2 th th th th th th to "Defendant B corporation (Defendant Counterclaim Plaintiff corporation)"; "the letter of agreement on the th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th 20th th th 20th th th 20.

2. Change B) As to Defendant B’s KRW 59,264,40 paid by Defendant B, from January 10, 2012 to July 17, 2014, Defendant B spent an amount equivalent to KRW 59,264,440 for the repair of the instant building due to the Plaintiff’s defect in the construction of the instant building, the Plaintiff is obligated to pay KRW 59,264,440 as compensation in lieu of the defect repair. The Plaintiff asserts that the Plaintiff is obligated to pay KRW 59,264,40 as compensation in lieu of the defect repair. The evidence presented as follows: (a) as evidence satisfying the above alleged facts of Defendant B’s assertion, there were the statements and images of Defendant B’s evidence and the testimony of Defendant W. However, the above evidence and evidence Nos. 24, 25, and 32 (including each of the following numbers) and the testimony of Defendant B’s testimony as a whole, namely, the circumstances that the testimony of each of the instant defect repair.