1. Plaintiff D, E, F, G, K, L, M, N, AH, EX, AH, and AO among the judgments of the first instance court, including claims reduced or expanded at the trial.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance except for the modification of the contents stated in the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in paragraph (2). Thus, it is citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. As for the modified part of the judgment of the first instance court No. 21, 6, “GY,” and “3 conduct under the following subparagraphs” (excluding net GY from among the networks), Plaintiff CP, Qu, CR, CSS, CTS, CU, and CV, which are the bereaved family members of the network GY, “The remainder except for the Plaintiff 22, 9 of the judgment of the first instance court deleted” shall be changed to “attached 3”; 11, “No. 19” of the first instance judgment to “No. 20,” and “No. 19 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be deleted from “the remainder other than net GY” of the 7th instance judgment of the first instance court to “the 19th judgment” of the first instance court; 43th judgment of the first instance to “the 19th judgment of the first instance court”; 40th judgment to “the remaining part of the plaintiffs’ health net No. 8,” and 9th judgment to “the 9th judgment of the 9th judgment of the lower judgment”, “the 10th judgment”.

E. In the instant case, from July 1950 and August 8, 1950, the Defendant’s date of the instant tort against the Deceased, about 64 years elapsed from October 17, 2014, which is the date of closing argument in the first instance trial, and considerable amount of monetary value.