logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.01.23 2014고단3876
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 26, 2014, around 23:30, the Defendant interfered with the duties of the victim’s emergency room by force, such as intending to franch F and G, an employee of the same hospital, “F, franch, fluor, fluor,” and intending to franch the outcome of the video reading, on the grounds that the Defendant did not know the results of the video reading inside the emergency room in the D Hospital located in the Dandong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam, the Defendant interfered with the duties of the victim’s emergency room.

2. On April 27, 2014, the Defendant was subject to the suspension of performance of official duties by the police officer I and I and I and I and I will return home, who were called out, after receiving 112 reports on the acts stipulated in paragraph (1) above in front of the Dental Emergency Office located in the Daar-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and received measures to stop the said acts and return home from the police officer I and I and I will return home.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the above I by putting the bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch mar, governance pline, etc., and putting the right-side bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch chch chchch chchch chchchch mick, and assaulted the above J by referring the above J as “A bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch ch

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to J and I;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of E, F and G;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act corresponding to the relevant criminal facts; Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (Mutual Crimes of Interference with Business and Crimes of Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act are applicable;

arrow