Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

A person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof after cooking shall not indicate the country of origin fraudulently.

Nevertheless, from August 1, 2013 to August 26, 2013, the Defendant prepared and provided meals to inmates, employees, etc. as the dietitians of meal service facilities established in the "F Hospital" located in Dongbcheon-si, and actually used the rice of the United States and domestic products mixed with those of the Republic of Korea, and purchased and used the domestic products of Chinese products and Brazil, but the indication of origin was falsely indicated in the indication of the place of origin by indicating the place of origin of rice, Chinese products, and chickens as domestic products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Written confirmation, each description of control ice photograph, and the application of video Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 15 and 6 (2) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and the Selection of Punishment for Criminal Facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant asserts that the Defendant’s assertion on the provisional payment order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not intentionally indicate the place of origin on the ground that the Defendant failed to modify the instant place of origin mark by negligence and did not intentionally indicate the

However, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the record, namely, the mark of origin of this case was attached to the main entrance of a restaurant (the statement of the defendant on the second trial date), the defendant was aware of such facts (the statement of the defendant on the first trial date) and the defendant was aware of the fact that the defendant was aware of the use of the U.S. rice, heavy domestic products distribution kimchi, brudic cream at the instant meal service center (the statement of the defendant on the second trial date) from the time when he was appointed as a dietitian of a F Hospital on August 1, 2013, the defendant was aware of the fact that he was aware of the use of the U.S. rice, Chinese products distribution c