logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.12.18 2014가단49508
토지인도등
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. The Defendants are indicated on the attached sheet Nos. 94, 29, 61, 96, 95, 95.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. While the Plaintiff owned each land listed in the separate sheet 1 and 2 (hereinafter referred to as “instant land 1 and 2”) in the separate sheet 1 and 2, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on April 18, 2013 with respect to each land of this case on the ground of trust to the International Trust Co., Ltd., and completed the registration of ownership transfer on August 23, 2013 on the ground of the attribution of trust property, and completed the registration of ownership transfer to C on December 19, 2014.

B. Defendant B completed the registration of ownership transfer on October 26, 2006 due to the trust on October 25, 2006, on the part of the Defendant Korea Land Trust Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Korea Land Trust”) (hereinafter “Defendant Land Trust”) with the land adjacent to each of the instant lands, 691 square meters and 21 square meters (hereinafter “each of the instant adjoining lands”).

다. 위 신탁토지 지상에 묘지관련시설로서 지상 5층의 D건물과 피고 B의 사찰건물이 건축되어 있는데, 위 각 건물의 부지 중 일부가 경계를 넘어와 별지 감정도 기재와 같이 이 사건 1토지 중 ㄴ내지ㅍ 부분 2,173㎡(이하 ‘이 사건 1토지 중 2,173㎡ 부분’이라고 한다)와 이 사건 2토지 중 ㄴ부분 11㎡(이하 ‘이 사건 2토지 중 11㎡ 부분’이라고 한다)를 침범하고 있다.

Defendant B completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of trust on December 24, 2008 with respect to D buildings among each of the above buildings, and on July 30, 2009 with respect to the temple buildings, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on the ground of trust with respect to the land trust with Defendant.

[Ground] Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 14, Eul evidence No. 2, Eul evidence No. 2, the result of the commission of surveying and appraisal to the Director of the Korea Cadastral Headquarters of Gwangju Metropolitan City, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. As to the claim against Defendant B, Defendant B without any title occupied and used the part of 2,173 square meters out of the land of this case and the part of 11 square meters out of the land of this case 2.

(B) Defendant B. Therefore, Defendant B.

arrow