The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was elected on June 4, 2014 by withdrawing as a candidate to D in the 6th nationwide local election.

No person shall publish false facts to an organization, etc. to which a candidate belongs, such as the place of birth, status, occupation, career, property, personality, etc., in favor of a candidate, for the purpose of election, by means of a speech, newspaper, communication, communication, magazine, propaganda document, or other means, and a candidate shall submit evidentiary documents on criminal records of punishment of one million won or more,

On October 4, 2004, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won on the 16th of the same month as a violation of the Building Act in the Jeju District Court's Jeju District Court's main branch on October 4, 2004, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 7, 2007, the Seoul High Court sentenced a fine of seven hundred thousand won as a violation of the Public Official Election Act, and two million won as to the violation of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry and the violation of the Construction Technology Management Act. The judgment on March 13, 2008 became final and conclusive

Nevertheless, on May 12, 2014, the Defendant submitted “written submission of evidence of criminal records” when filing an application for registration with a preliminary candidate with the original residential district election commission located in the original residential district, which was located in the original residential district, on May 12, 2014, the Defendant submitted “written submission of evidence of criminal records” to the said criminal records section, and submitted “written submission of evidence of criminal records” without stating the violation of the Building Act, fine of two million won, and criminal records related to the violation of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry and the violation of the Construction Technology Management Act. At that time, the Defendant had an employee of the said election commission, who is unaware of such fact, send 135,683 copies of the Defendant’s book-type election campaign bulletin to the electors in the said constituency.

Accordingly, the defendant published false information about the defendant's career in favor of the defendant for the purpose of election in the above election.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The defendant;