logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2018.02.21 2017고단1000
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 9, 2012, the Defendant is a person who violated the provisions on prohibition of drinking alcohol driving on two or more occasions by receiving a summary order of a fine of KRW 2 million for a crime of violating road traffic law in the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court on August 9, 2012, and a fine of KRW 3.5 million in the same court on April 23, 2015 for the same crime.

1. On March 11, 2016, the Defendant driven a three-way vehicle without a driver’s license in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 0.077% from the front of the front of the relevant terminal, which is located in the speed of 132-57 (Cheongdong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong 78.07% under the influence of alcohol.

2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) was discovered in front of the ean apartment road in front of the front of the ean apartment road, and was found to E at the police station D affiliated with the Jinan Police Station that was under the influence of drinking on the road; (b) the Defendant was friendly F; (c) provided the F’s resident registration number to the above police officer, thereby illegally using another person’s resident registration number.

3. The Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 2, such as electronic records, and the electronic records of the above writers, had the Defendant sign F without authority on the PDA screen of a portable police terminal (PDA) while carrying out as if the Defendant was F, and submitted it to the police officer to have the Defendant transmit it to the police internal computer network.

Accordingly, for the purpose of making administrative affairs smooth, the defendant neglected to notify the results of the drinking driving control in the name of F, a private electronic record, which is an electronic record of fact certification, and exercised it.

4. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, runs as if he were F, to the foregoing E under the influence of drinking at the time and place, and to the driver column of the driver’s circumstantial statement report.

arrow