logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2021.01.14 2020고단3838
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 18, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3 million due to a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking) at the Busan District Court.

1. On August 19, 2020, the Defendant driven a CK7 vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license in a state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 0.045% in a section of approximately 30 meters in front of the two roads in Yangsan-si, Yangsan-si.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking alcohol driving at least twice, and driving a motor vehicle without obtaining a driver's license.

2. The Defendant at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, such as the violation of the Resident Registration Act, electronic records, etc., electronic records of the above writers, forgery of private documents, and the above investigation document: (a) when driving a vehicle while driving the vehicle, he would be subject to criminal punishment; (b) the Defendant would have expressed the Defendant’s name and resident registration number to F of the police officer E of the Yangsan Police Station; and (c) the above police officer stated D’s “D’s report on detection of the driver’s identity” in relation to D prepared by the above police officer using the PDA short machine of traffic control, who was requested to sign the vehicle and deliver it to the above police officer so that the Defendant sent it to the aforementioned police officer with the signature of the driver’s report on detection of the driver’s identity and sent it to the aforementioned police officer as genuinely constituted; and (d) the above police officer’s statement that “the driver’s opinion on the driver’s opinion on D’s oral statement” prepared by the above police officer was forged and sent to the police officer.

In this respect, the defendant uses another person's resident registration number unlawfully and causes another person to handle affairs.

arrow