beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
purport.
Reasons
1. The facts under the basis of the facts are either in dispute between the parties or acknowledged by considering the overall purport of the pleadings as a whole in each entry of Gap evidence 1 and 5 (including the Serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply).
Plaintiff
A Religious Organizations (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff church”) are religious organizations created D around 1962, and have their doctrine, namely, “D”, “D” as “permanent mother”, “E” as “permanent mother”, “to observe Saturdays,” and comply with the season, such as the wintering of oil.
Plaintiff
After D's death in 1985, the church has continued to engage in missionary activities with N as the general assembly leader.
The Defendants entered the Plaintiff church in around 1999 and were expelled from around 2008, and are members of the Internet Gain called “O”(hereinafter referred to as “O”), “O”( Q).
The defendants expressed that the plaintiff had expressed that the plaintiff had known that he had known that he had known about the fact that he had caused the plaintiff's transfer of property by taking the plaintiff's home wave, which caused the plaintiff's divorce by taking the plaintiff's husband who would not leave the plaintiff's church, and caused the plaintiff's family in this land's expression that he caused the plaintiff's divorce by taking the plaintiff's transfer of his husband who caused the plaintiff's transfer of the plaintiff's church, the plaintiff's family in this land caused the plaintiff's transfer of family mar by taking the fake and so on only the string family members' transfer of fake and so on, on several occasions from February 15, 2014 to August 16, 2014, conducted a demonstration by setting up the scicket, etc., such as the attached Form, the road side, the plaintiff's church, etc. at the front of the plaintiff's church, and using the loudspeaker,
2. The parties' assertion
A. The Defendants asserted that the Plaintiff church had damaged the honor of the Plaintiff church by pointing out false facts with the aim of slandering the Plaintiff church, so the Defendants shall jointly pay consolation money to the Plaintiff.
The Defendants are 124 times in total from February 15, 2014 to August 16, 2014, but the time, place, and 124 times asserted by the Plaintiff.