The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Although the summary of the grounds for appeal is sufficiently recognized by the defendant as described in the facts charged, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the victim of the insult of the facts charged in this case is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts.

2. Determination

A. On June 11, 2013, the summary of the charge of insult among the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by saying, “A, the manager of the D apartment management office, and four employees of the management office, including G, who are the head of the D apartment management office, at the D apartment 102 front of the D apartment 102-dong, Namyang-si, Namyang-si, as well as the victim, “a woman is a son, thereby creating a family wave” and “Fraud.”

B. According to the records, the court below held that the victim was a new intention of "J church K association", which is the victim of He, one male, one female, and the victim was living together with F on the same day of this case, who led the defendant to open the present door and attempted to conduct a missionary activity after inducing the defendant to attend the present door, and that the defendant did not use the above expression "vid" to the victim's employees as stated in the facts charged, but did not use the victim's "red" as stated in the facts charged, although he visited the members of the neighboring church at the time of this case to visit the above subparagraph (a) and to do missionary activity as above, and the victim had expressed his opinion about the above individual church's opinion. According to the above facts acknowledged, according to the above facts, the defendant expressed his opinion about the above opinion, he expressed his opinion about the above individual church as one of the above.