logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2019.02.14 2018고단2994
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 25, 2018, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) around 03:00 on the 25th of the Gyeonggi-gu Police Station in the 212 Gyeonggi-gu, the Gyeonggi-gu, the Gyeonggi-gu, the Gyeonggi-gu, the Gyeonggi-do, under the influence of alcohol, found the said district as a taxi engineer and taxi fare; and (b) found it as the said district while under the influence of alcohol, and (c) paid a fine of KRW 4 million due to a police officer, who did not want to kill and kill police officers because he did not want to do so.”

2. On October 25, 2018, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender for the same reasons as the preceding paragraph, and was committed to the Gyeonggi-Pacific Police Station at around 04:30 on October 25, 2018 as the decline in the match.

On the ground that the Defendant was not willing to investigate the Defendant at the criminal department and office of the Gyeonggi-Pacific Police Station and office, the Defendant did not want to hand over the Defendant to his family on the ground that the police officer affiliated with the above police station was trying to hand over the Defendant to his family, and that he was unable to be bullyingd from the police in the past, and the Defendant used the Defendant to assault the Defendant B on the ground that he was “brupted by the width family members,” and the bucks, such as waste boms, boms, and bucks, all of which were bombs, and bucks, such as boms, boms, and bucks, bombs, etc., “, etc.,” and buck off to the above B’s left hand hand of the Defendant, and bucks and bucks, etc., bucks and bucks, etc., against the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of official duties in relation to the protective measures of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. B written statements;

1. Video CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties) and Article 3 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, which are applicable to the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment.

arrow