The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

1. Summary of the facts charged and the judgment of the court below

A. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, as the head of the Korea Public Officials’ Union E head of D’s Department for the interest of Grade 6 public officials belonging to D institutions, was willing to hold a meeting under the name of “I” upon the issuance of G reporters (the companies in the past had been suffering from suspicions of receiving money and valuables from the companies in the past) as the presiding official in the Chungcheongbuk H. On August 10, 2016, the Defendant would hold a meeting at a point of 100 meters each of the India’s 15:15 of the K date from L date to L date, and 24:00 days each of India’s 10 meters each.

In spite of the filing of a report on outdoor assembly to the effect that the report was submitted, at around 10:30 L. date, in front of the NM headquarters located outside the place of the report on the above assembly, “Woo-ho Blus UT FOT’s discontinuance of the press”, “Woo-ho Blus MUT HUT’s threat to a bribe hub,” and “doz.”

Doz. Doz.

Around 10:40, the PP, at around 10:10, violated the rules of conduct as the organizer to maintain the order of the assembly by entering the second floor market in front of the second floor and clearly deviating from the scope of the reported place in the manner of 10 minutes (hereinafter “instant assembly”) with other participants who arrive in the M organization and entered the second floor market, and entered the second floor of the M organization, together with other participants in the event that there is an obvious deviation from the scope of the place of assembly in the manner of 10 minutes (hereinafter “instant assembly”).

B. The lower court found the Defendant guilty as to the facts charged of the instant case on the ground of the Defendant’s partial statement, including witness Q, R, and S’s legal statement and evidence (from 10 to 24 pages of the investigation record, hereinafter the same) taken pictures of the instant assembly, on the ground that there was no request from the public official in charge in W or police officers for the eviction, entering the front and the second floor market room in front of the front and the second floor.