logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.09.13 2018고단2861
위증
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant knew of his husband C, who was a second half of his husband C, and called D as “third village”.

In the case of the Defendant’s appearance and oath on January 29, 2018, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the above court 2017 order 3470 order 2017 order 2017 order 3470 order 3,00 order 3,00 order 5:20 order 15:20 order 15:0 order 15:20 order 15:0 order 2000 order

The prosecutor’s question of “E face” was cleaned.

“I” and “C”

It is essential that he had no family even though he was in the same Gun.

The prosecutor’s question “I have never been during the period of time.”

testimony, “E’s face is unfolded or not any one is required.”

“At all, the prosecutor’s question “ must be asked.”

It is necessary to give testimony and to leave any place including arms, legs, face.

It is difficult to examine the prosecutor's question " by day because it was difficult to do so."

E did not have any kind of relationship.

“The testimony was made.”

Then, it is essential whether the defendant "at first entered Korea, E was not sufficient, and later there was a dispute with F.

Defendant (D) testified to the Prosecutor’s inquiry, “Ap.” and “Defendant (D) has entered the place;

required to be entered.

“I have become aware of the questions of the presiding judge.”

“The testimony was made.”

However, at around 16:00 on August 10, 2016, the Defendant observed a face where E was faced with the face and body at the time of arrival in the “H main point” located in Pyeongtaek-gun G, Gyeonggi-do, and even though D was witnessed, he made a statement contrary to his memory as above.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Copies of each protocol of examination of witness, and copies of each record;

1. Copy of the statement made by the police against the defendant;

1. A copy of a medical certificate of injury or a copy of a medical certificate;

1. Copies of each recording;

1. A copy of the judgment of the Speaker's District Court Decision 2017 Highest 3470

1. D. D.

arrow