1. The Defendant’s KRW 23,240,905 as well as 5% per annum from December 5, 2014 to October 13, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On March 1, 1998, the Plaintiff was appointed as a full-time lecturer at C University (title after modification: D University) operated by the Defendant and was promoted as an associate professor on October 1, 2006.

B. From the salary system, the Defendant maintained the salary system for the salary of teachers by not later than the year of 1998, which is paid by adding the salary in accordance with the annual salary system and various allowances to the salary system for the salary of teachers. From March 1, 1999, the Defendant newly enacted and implemented a provision for the payment of annual salary system with the purport that the salary shall be paid according to the annual salary reflecting the results of the immediately preceding year of the teachers. 2) Before the enactment of the provision for the payment of annual salary system, the Defendant, at the Teachers’ Training Council held on February 25, 1999, explained the implementation of the annual salary system among 78 of all teachers including the Plaintiff, including the Plaintiff, at around 199, submitted a written consent for the application of the annual salary system individually from the above teachers on March 3, 199.

3) On July 15, 2010, professor E, who is the Deputy Director of Planning, sent a letter of consent to the implementation of the annual salary system to the professors, who were in service at the time of the enactment of the above annual salary system, and 35 persons, including the Plaintiff, from among 45 persons who were present at the time, signed a letter of consent to the implementation of the annual salary system in the form of joint signature by 35 persons, including the Plaintiff. 4) The Defendant sent a letter of consent to the implementation of the annual salary system to the professors, who were in service at the time of the enactment of the above annual salary system, on February 5, 2015. 32 of the 41 participants were gathered on the sixth floor of the Defendant’s Information Center, and expressed their consent to the implementation of the annual salary system.

C. From December 17, 2011 to November 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) the Plaintiff entered the “paid amount” column in the separate sheet for calculation of benefits attached to the Plaintiff; and (b) the amount of benefits the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff via the evidence No. 22, is more than the amount of benefits the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff.