1. The defendant

A. The phrase “personal worth” in the attached Table 2-1 sheet to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) shall be the money and each amount.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a school foundation that establishes and operates the E University (the current name was changed to F University; hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant School") under its jurisdiction, and the plaintiff (the appointed party; hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff A") was appointed as the full-time teacher of each E University around March 1, 2002, around March 1, 2002, and around March 1, 1994.

B. The Defendant maintained the salary system in which the sum of salaries and various allowances according to the salary class in the public order of the year of 198 with respect to the teachers’ benefits system was paid as remuneration for the year of 1998. On March 1, 1999, the Defendant enacted the annual salary system in which remuneration is paid according to the annual salary that reflects the results of the immediately preceding year of the teachers and implemented it substantially since 2000.

C. In the process, prior to the enactment of the provision on the payment of annual salary system, the Defendant held a meeting of one semester on February 9, 199 to provide the teachers with simple guidance on the enforcement of the annual salary system, and received individual written consent from the above teachers on March 199.

On July 15, 2010, G, the planning Director of the Defendant, held a faculty meeting on July 15, 2010 in order to obtain ratification from professors with respect to the above provisions of the annual salary system enacted on March 1, 1999, and 40 of the 45 participants at the time attended and signed a letter of consent to the "written consent to supplement the annual salary system" in the form of joint signature by 35 of them.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6 (including branch numbers, if a serial number is not indicated; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, or the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. 1 The Defendant changed the benefit system from the previous salary system to the annual salary system that reflects the results of professors in the immediately preceding year after the year 1999, but this did not undergo a resolution of the board of directors.