1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall alter an officially-approved taximeter without permission or use such altered taximeter.

1. On February 1, 2015, at around 06:15, the Defendant, as a taxi engineer, changed a taximeter without permission by either removing the seal of a taximeter installed in D-si located in the Dong-si located in Chuncheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Inc., and dividing the number by ecmats, etc., using the taximeter without permission. The Defendant used the altered taximeter by operating the said taxi installed with the altered taximeter.

2. On February 3, 2015, at around 20:26, the Defendant altered the taximeter of the said taxi without permission in the same manner as described in paragraph (1), and used the altered taximeter by operating the said taxi with the foregoing altered taximeter.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written accusation against C Stock Company;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A criminal investigation report (Submission, etc. of evidentiary materials);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the interrogation protocol of prosecution concerning F;

1. Article 79 subparagraph 12 of the Automobile Management Act and Article 47 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances in light of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act shall be determined by taking into consideration favorable circumstances, such as the following: (a) the Defendant informed his criminal facts to E by the employees of C Co., Ltd. before the occurrence of the instant crime; (b) the Defendant led to the confession and in depth of the crime; and (c) the Defendant was not