logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2013. 07. 11. 선고 2013두6497 판결
(심리불속행) 이 사건 주권 양도는 ‘국가가 주권을 양도’하는 경우에 해당하여 비과세 양도라고 할 것임[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2011Nu43036 (Law No. 25, 2013)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho High Court Decision 2010Du2851 ( December 31, 2010)

Title

(D) The transfer of share certificates in this case constitutes a transfer of share certificates by a State and thus a non-taxation transfer.

Summary

(C) Article 6 subparagraph 1 of the Securities Transaction Tax Act does not apply to the transfer of share certificates of this case. Thus, the transfer of share certificates of this case is not subject to securities transaction tax. Therefore, the disposition of this case which refused a plaintiff's request for correction on the ground that the securities transaction tax may be imposed on the transfer of share certificates of this case is illegal.

Related statutes

Article 6 of the Securities Transaction Tax Act

Article 117(1)18 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act

Cases

2013Du6497 Revocation of Disposition Rejecting Securities Transaction Tax, etc.

Plaintiff-Appellee

AAAA

Defendant-Appellant

BBB

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2011Nu43036 Decided January 25, 2013

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal are examined, but it is clear that the grounds of appeal by the appellant fall under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent

Reference materials.

If the grounds for final appeal are not included in the grounds of appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of final appeal will not continue to proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final appeal, but will not proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final

arrow