logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.07.06 2017고단2948
사문서위조등
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The gist of the facts charged lies in having the Defendant complete the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the Defendant by pretending that he/she was donated with respect to the “Nos. 202, 722, 202, and 202, the title of the apartment of Overcheon E-si (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”) owned by D, her mother, as his/her mother.

A. On March 3, 2017, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) using a computer network in “G Reading room” located in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, to donate the apartment of this case to the Defendant; (b) the Defendant prepared a real estate donation contract with the intent to acquire a new bank obligation, etc.; (c) entered the name of the donor into “D(H)”, “Seoul Special Metropolitan City Yongsan-gu I”, and “J” into “Seoul Special Metropolitan City,” and printed out in “A4 paper; and (d) stored the Defendant on the name of the female.

D his seal has been affixed.

In addition, while preparing a power of attorney to delegate the acts related to one application for registration, the act was inserted into the column for indication of real estate in Gyeonggi-do E apartment No. 722 Dong 202, Dong 202, "Gift 3, 2017," "donation" in the column for the purpose of registration, "donation" in the column for the purpose of registration, and "a person without intention to engage in the same as "D or Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I" in the column for the delegating, and then affixed the above seal on the side of the name of the person without registration.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising rights, the Defendant committed each of the following acts: a non-real estate donation contract and a letter of delegation, each of which are assumed in the name of D, a private document on the duty of rights.

B. On March 6, 2017, the Defendant held the aforementioned investigation document by submitting a false real estate donation agreement and the proxy form as if they were a document duly formed, respectively, to the registered public official, who was unable to know his/her name that he/she was aware of the forgery at the 69 Suyang support registry No. 212, Gi-ro 212, Gi-ro, Gi-ro, Pyeongyang-ro, Gi-ro, 2017.

(c)

The defendant shall enter false records, such as electronic records, at the same time and place as the above paragraph.

arrow