logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.12.19 2014고단1901
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Interference with business of victims C;

A. On August 2014, from around 06:00 on the first day to 07:00 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s marina business by force for about one hour, such as being under the influence of alcohol in E-art operated by the victim C and then being the victim, without any reason, while drinking alcohol in E-art operated by the victim C, and destroying it.

B. On September 2014, from around 06:00 on the first day to around 08:00 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s marina business by force for about two hours, such as: (a) the Defendant gets the victim as described in the foregoing paragraph (a); (b) and (c) having the victim escape from the above marina; and (d) having the victim escape from the above marina; and (b) having the victim escape from the above marina; and (c) thereby,

C. On September 1, 2014, from around 02:00 to around 05:00 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) took the victim’s drinking alcohol from the said Emart to the victim; (b) took the victim’s bath to “fishing”; and (c) took the victim’s escape out of the said Empt; and (d) obstructed the victim’s marina business by force for about three hours.

On October 12, 2014, from around 03:00 to around 05:20 on the same day, the Defendant found in the said Empt two occasions, saying, “The Defendant would throw away from the victim,” and said, “the Defendant would have caused the victim to die,” and obstructed the victim’s marina business by force for about one hour, such as having the victim escape from the above Empt.

2. On October 14, 2014, from around 01:00 on October 14, 2014 to around 01:30 on the same day, the Defendant was refused to provide alcohol to the victim in the restaurant in the name of H operated by the victim F in net City G from around 01:0.

arrow