A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) reported that the Defendant intended to assault his name in the Seogu-gu culture of 301, the Seogu, Seogu-gu, Seogu, and reported that he would assault the Defendant’s name influorial money; (b) the police officer B of the Daegu Seo-gu Police Station B of the Police Station B of the Daegu Seo-gu, Seogu, who called out after having received a report, and (c) the Defendant exceeded the same bit of bitch bit of bitch.

The inside of the Republic of Korea is off and flag off A(c) clothes, I am gue, I am part of this gue, Madro.

The desire of "D. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. kn the right shoulder of the above C by hand.

As above, Defendant assaulted police officers, thereby obstructing police officers from performing their legitimate duties regarding the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. Application of the B Acts and subordinate statutes on the land where he works for the district;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reasoning for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the Defendant was punished by a fine of three million won for interference with the performance of official duties in 2014. However, in light of all the circumstances, the Defendant was found to have committed the instant crime, which appears to have been committed by the Defendant at the time of committing the instant crime, and the Defendant was not much damaged by police officers without the degree of assault committed by the Defendant, and the Defendant’s appeal against the situation in which the Defendant should support his mother (87 years old) is boomed. It is so ordered as per Disposition.