Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 3.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. Damage to property;

A. On December 11, 2015, the Defendant, at around 22:10 permanent residence C (n, 41 years of age) of the victim C (n, I) who was under the influence of alcohol at D’s main points operated by the Defendant, stated “a change in the internal mobile phone” to the victim without any justifiable reason, thereby impairing its utility by setting up a general telephone device on the floor of the main point, which was on the floor of the market value of 56,000 won.

B. On December 11, 2015, the Defendant, at the permanent residence of 22:40 on December 22:40, 2015, arrested as a flagrant offender and took the charge of causing damage to property and obstructing the performance of official duties in the second floor of the Gel 2, which is operated by the Defendant, as a flagrant offender, damaged the convenience of 50,000 won at the market price of the first floor and the second floor of the second floor, thereby damaging its utility.

2. On December 11, 2015, the Defendant who interfered with the performance of official duties and on December 22:30:

1. A. As set forth in paragraph (a), the permanent police station H District Assistant I, etc., who called for the cell phone at D main points, may have a cell phone in the Defendant’s accommodation, and the Defendant, at the time of permanent residence of the Defendant, tried to confirm the place of final drinking and to call the Defendant’s cell phone to J, who is the Defendant’s volunteer, as the head of Gel 209, at the time of permanent residence of the Defendant.

As a result, in 210, the Defendant: (a) 210, the Defendant’s mobile phone level 1, Haman, and Haman found his mobile phone; (b) returned to the Defendant, who was on the second floor, and (c) asked him to enter the guest room; and (d) from that time, the Defendant, from that time, did not die of this spule.

Whether a person who finds a mobile phone is a person;

The police officer interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the police officer, such as assaulting the left face of the slope I on one occasion by drinking while stating that he/she will kill him/her in front of the inside.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C. Each police statement with respect to I, and a statement prepared by F.