logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.20 2017고단3355
재물손괴등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 4, 2017, the Defendant damaged property: (a) around 14:10, the market price owned by the said victim, such as a glass wall in the store, etc., on the ground that “E” operated by the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Victim D (40 tax) is bad in the state of alcohol in front of the first story, and (b) a computer monitor owned by the victim D, and a telephone flag, which was located in the calculating unit, was removed by means of a glass wall and a entrance door in the store.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged another person's property and harmed its utility.

2. On May 4, 2017, at around 14:29, the Defendant: (a) was arrested by the police officer G belonging to the F police box called up after having received a report of 112 that there was a person who would destroy goods and avoid disturbance within the main point of the above E, and was arrested as a current offender for the crime of destroying property from the police officer G belonging to the police box called up, and went to the patrol box, and subsequently, the Defendant got out of the patrol box, thereby preventing the window of the said vehicle from operating.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

3. The Defendant interferes with the performance of official duties at the time, time, and place as referred to in paragraph 2, and at the same time, at a place as referred to in paragraph 2, G, who is a police officer of the F police box that controls the act as referred to in paragraph 2, shall

The flab flab flab "the head of this flab", and the Defendant flabed the body of G over three times on the Defendant her chest, and spits spits on the face of the above G on several occasions.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties in relation to suppression and prevention of crimes and investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement protocol with respect to G;

1. A statement prepared by H;

1. A damaged photograph and each image photograph;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (in case of attaching documentary images without the case process);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of damage to property), Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of damage to property for public use), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties), and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties),

arrow