A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving CK5 cars.

On October 27, 2013, at around 11:50, the Defendant: (a) operated the Gyeyang-distance intersection in the Gyeyang-dong at the time of Busan Metropolitan City, to the front part of the Defendant’s car, because the Defendant is an intersection with a device installed by the signal at the time of the operation of the said vehicle to the person in the area from the view of the view of the viewing room. In such cases, even though the Defendant had an occupational duty to safely drive the vehicle in accordance with the new code, the Defendant, despite his/her negligence, conflict with the left side part of the E-UP car driven by the victim D (53 years old) who was driving in accordance with the new code from the right side of the course of the collision with the upper part of the Defendant

The Defendant, through occupational negligence, suffered approximately two weeks of cage cage cage cage cages and tensions to victims D, and the victim F (the 51 years old), who was on board the head of the damaged vehicle, respectively, with approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and escaped without immediately stopping the said cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cages

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime (the point of failing to take measures after destroying and damaging property) of the relevant Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of punishment and limited imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is limited to the defendant's liability for the reason of sentencing, the victims and the victim's vehicle have agreed to do so.