A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a small-scale car B.

On December 26, 2012, the Defendant driven the above car on December 16, 2012, and proceeded with lurgical distance in the Tae-dong, Daegu Northern-gu, Taecheon Elementary School with lurgical hurgical hurgs.

However, since it is an intersection where signal lights are installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive in accordance with the signals by reducing speed and checking the right and the right of the road well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went through a red signal signal as it was, and the victim C (the age of 48) driving of the victim C (the age of 48) driving on the left-hand door of the Plaintiff’s U.S. car was the front part of the said U.S. car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, sustained an injury to the victim, such as satisf, which requires treatment of approximately two weeks, and at the same time, escaped without any necessary measures, such as identifying the victim and providing relief to the victim, even though the said DB car was destroyed by the repair cost of KRW 1,230,867.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation report (the details of telephone conversations with the shootingr);

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Accident site and vehicle photograph;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning medical treatment and investigative cooperation;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the crime, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of failing to take measures after destroying or damaging property);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances):

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant's reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for an order to attend a compliance driving lecture.