logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2014.10.22 2014고정919
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

B was introduced by the Defendant as the person who was working as the team leader at the ‘D' mobile phone sales store in Daegu-gu, and applied for the purchase of a mobile phone from the Defendant, and the person was allowed to borrow cash from the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the 'portable tin') and sold the mobile phone to the middle and high-income bracket.

1. On October 29, 2012, the Defendant and B, who committed the crime against a mobile phone opened in the name of E, filed an application for membership of a mobile phone in the name of E with his/her signature on the application form for membership of a mobile phone and submitted the application form for membership of four mobile phones in the name of E to E, a patient at the time of his/her hospitalization, by stating that the Defendant would make him/her take cash when he/she opened the four mobile phone in his/her own name. B had E actually opened the four mobile phone and used the four mobile phone in fact, and submitted the application form for membership of a mobile phone in the name of E to the victim SK Telecom Co., Ltd.

However, in fact, the defendant and the B are only 4 mobile phone offices due to the need of cash, and they are actually aware that they have no intention or ability to pay the mobile phone installments and the mobile phone usage fees without using at all 4 mobile phones, despite the fact that they actually purchased the mobile phone and use the mobile phone and then open the mobile phone under the E's name as if they would pay properly the mobile phone usage fees, and they were issued 4 mobile phone units equivalent to the total market value of 3,669,600 won from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant and B were provided property by deceiving the victim in collusion.

2. On November 13, 2012, the Defendant and B, who committed the crime against a mobile phone opened in the name of F, are expected to pay cash to F, a patient of “her own hospital”, who is a patient of “her own hospital,” by using four mobile phones in his/her own name, and B actually opens F, with four mobile phones.

arrow