Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for one year, for Defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

The victim M&S Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim Company”) is a subsidiary specialized in the distribution of the case, and operates a distribution business of wire and wireless telecommunications services, and receives an application for communication service from those who have the intent or ability to pay wired and wireless devices and communication fees, and operates the device through which they receive an application for communication service, and receive the principal and interest, other than subsidies, in installments during the agreed period.

On October 201, the Defendants: (a) were those with experience in attracting subscribers to radio communications services; (b) opened a mobile phone from the victim company to use the mobile phone, and (c) made a false call to the victim company to pay a small amount of money to those who need to receive a small amount of money for three months, and automatically terminate it after three months,” or (d) “to lend money to the victim company via opening of a mobile phone; (b) submit the victim company’s application for opening of the mobile phone; and (c) the victim company submitted the application for opening of the mobile phone in the name of the victim company and submitted the application for opening of the mobile phone; and (d) made a false call as if the purchaser would normally use the mobile phone through opening of the mobile phone; and (e) made a payment from the victim company to the purchaser of the mobile phone to a small amount of money; and (e) the remaining

Accordingly, on October 21, 201 through Defendant A’s subordinate recruitment book, the Defendants reported online small-sum loan advertisements and obtained his/her consent on the fact that “I would make 40,000 won per unit if I/she has subscribed to a mobile phone service.” Although he/she was well aware of the fact that E was not an intention or ability to pay installment payments and communications fees while taking advantage of the normally mobile phone radio communication service at the time, the Defendants were to the employees in charge of opening the victim company.