logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.02.13 2018가합55203
손해배상(의)
Text

1. Defendant C: (a) KRW 144,186,787; and (b) KRW 8,000,000 to Plaintiff B; and (c) each of them, from January 10, 2015 to January 10, 2019.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the party concerned Plaintiff A is the Plaintiff’s spouse of Plaintiff A, who received balconium No. 4-5 in the E Hospital (hereinafter “instant hospital”), No. 5 in the E Hospital, and No. 5 in the balconium No. 1 in the balconium, and complained of balconium, urinology, urinology, etc.

On the other hand, Defendant C is a doctor in charge of diagnosis of Plaintiff A as a medical specialist in an external surgery who is in office in the instant hospital. Defendant D is a doctor in charge of diagnosis of Plaintiff A with respect to the Plaintiff, and the Defendants are the co-president of the said hospital.

B. As a result of the diagnosis at the instant hospital of Plaintiff A around January 9, 2015, Plaintiff A explained that the instant hospital was diagnosed by Defendant C, and that there was a pain on the bridge. The Defendant C diagnosed the said Plaintiff’s condition by means of the cT and RI photograph of Plaintiff CT and the vertI, and then diagnosed the said Plaintiff’s 4-5 Embrate back escape certificate and the vertebrate colon’s colon.

Defendant C recommended the Plaintiff to perform the relevant treatment method for the instant treatment, and the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the instant hospital in order to undergo the relevant treatment method for the instant treatment method.

C. The Plaintiff A’s condition 1 after the instant surgery and the instant surgery (hereinafter “instant surgery”), Defendant C, from January 10, 2015 to October 10, 2015, from around 09:50 to around 10:10, Defendant C, to the Plaintiff A, No. 4-5, and No. 5-cheon 1, respectively (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

(2) The plaintiff A implemented the following: (a) whether there is no problem with the movement without any particular reason immediately after the completion of the instant process; (b) around 17:15, the nurse did not have a force on the bridge; and (c) the nurse did not have any force on the bridge again, and the nurse reported the plaintiff A's above status to the defendant C around that time.

3 The plaintiff A gradually suffers from marina, and around 20:30, the plaintiff A cannot walk alone due to the lack of force on each bridge, and moving wheel chairs without the aid of a nurse.

arrow