beta
Text
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
Purport of claim and appeal
1.
Reasons
Basic Facts
The Plaintiffs are married and the Defendant is a juristic person that operates the D Hospital (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Hospital”).
Plaintiff
A was diagnosed that the symptoms of the left 1, 2, 107 left her to the Defendant Hospital were applied to the Defendant Hospital on August 8, 2017, as a result of the background radioactive and CT inspection, that there was a serious symptoms of the cirrosis, the cirrosis and the cirrosis of both sides, No. 3-4 of the cirical 3-5 of the cirrosis, the cirrosis and the cirrosis of both sides, No. 5-6 of the cirrosis, and the cirrosis of both sides, No. 6-7 of the cirrosis, and there was a strong symptoms of both sides.
Accordingly, on the same day, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital carried out the 4-5 square meters of the negotition to Plaintiff A. On the 14th day of the same month, and carried out the negotition surgery on the 14th day of the same month, and the negotition surgery on the 21st day of the same month, but around the 28th day of the same month, the Plaintiff’s appeal that “the body of the Plaintiff was low, the right-hand hand is low, and it is difficult to do so at night,” the Plaintiff suspended the implementation of the legotition, and prescribed the legotiologicsis for the Plaintiff’s symptoms on September 11, 2017.”
Plaintiff
A, around September 2017, at the Gyeongbuk University Hospital, he was diagnosed of scopic scopic scopic disease and spine copic chopic chopic chopic chopic chopic (Ch. 4-5-6) and complained of low symptoms, scopic symptoms, scopic s
[Ground of recognition] The plaintiffs asserted that there was no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8 (including the number with various numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 9, Gap evidence Nos. 9, and all of the arguments as to the cause of claim for the overall purport of the argument. ① The plaintiff Gap suffered a present symptoms to Gap due to the negligence in the procedure of the defendant hospital, such as where the plaintiff was placed in a mixed state while undergoing the instant procedure by the defendant hospital.
② The Defendant’s blood pressure and pressure to Plaintiff A as an operation for blocking the instant neurosis.