1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for changing or adding corresponding parts as set forth in paragraph (2) below.

2. Parts to be altered or added;

A. 1) An alteration of the part in the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance is 1) the “this Court” in the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance is converted into “Seoul Central District Court”. 2) The “Seoul District Court” in the 13th sentence of the judgment of the first instance is converted into “Seoul Central District Court”.

3) The Plaintiff’s “Plaintiff” in the 13th sentence of the judgment of the first instance is replaced by “Mnonoon”. 4) The term “labor members” in the 14th sentence of the judgment of the first instance is replaced by “Labor Relations Commission”.

B. 1) Following the judgment of the first instance court’s 13 line “(1).” Then, the court added “Although the second labor union, etc. filed an appeal with Seoul High Court 2016Na6950, the said court dismissed the appeal under Article 20 on October 27, 2017, and the second labor union filed an appeal with the Supreme Court 201Da51610 again, which is currently pending in the final appeal.”

2) Following the 27th sentence of the first instance judgment, “The defendant representative director, management and prosecutor appealeds as the Daejeon District Court 2017No663 on August 16, 2017 on the following grounds: (a) the defendant representative director, management and prosecutor filed an appeal as to the 27th sentence “(2015No768)”; and (b) the said court accepted some defendants’ assertion of unfair sentencing on August 16, 2017, and found most of the above facts constituting the crime except for the acquittal of some facts charged by the defendant representative director, management and prosecutor as the Supreme Court Decision 2017Do13781 on December 22, 2017; (c) the Supreme Court dismissed all the appeals filed by the defendant representative director, management and prosecutor on December 22, 2017, and added the said judgment to

3) Following the 4 lines below the 27th sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part of 'A' is added. The defendant against 'A' is invalid even if the establishment of 'A' is made invalid.