1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

1. The grounds for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the parts amended or added under paragraph (2) below, and thus, they are cited including the attached Form pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. A corrected or added portion;

A. On No. 3 of the first instance judgment, the part of the first instance judgment, “to supplement the instant drying machine and revise the terms and conditions of the instant contract,” which reads “to modify the terms and conditions of the instant contract, such as supplementing the instant drying machine and abandoning the remainder.”

B. Once No. 3 of the first instance judgment, the fact of recognizing the part of “A” is added following the 16th instance judgment.

On August 2, 2012, the Plaintiff suggested a quarterly repayment plan on August 16, 2012, “The Plaintiff shall not proceed smoothly with the acquisition negotiation of the instant drying machine.” On August 2, 2012, the Plaintiff presented to the Defendant a quarterly repayment plan for the instant drying machine (contract money and intermediate payment) received through the Defendant’s “to give an opportunity to participate in the open competition at the time of the second order and request to grant an opportunity in the future.” Thereafter, the Plaintiff presented a quarterly repayment plan on August 16, 2012, and on August 20, 2012, the Plaintiff presented a quarterly repayment plan for at least five percent of the above repayment schedule and the offer of collateral for the instant drying machine. On September 10, 2012, the Defendant presented a quarterly repayment plan to the Defendant by the end of February 1, 2014 while it is difficult to grant the Plaintiff a grace period until the end of February 1, 2012.

C. The part of the first instance judgment Nos. 6 through 14 is replaced by the lower part of the “A” indicated below.

Gap evidence No. 7 shall include the whole purport of oral proceedings.