logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015. 09. 24. 선고 2015누37299 판결
이 사건 주택은 5호이상 장기임대주택에 대한 감면에 해당하지 않음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court 2014Gudan10076 (2015.02.04)

Case Number of the previous trial

Appellate Court 2014west0197 (Law No. 1284, 2014)

Title

The instant housing does not constitute reduction or exemption for five or more long-term rental houses.

Summary

(1) The instant house cannot be deemed as a house independent of other parts due to its structural structure or use to the extent that it can be the object of independent transaction under the social concept, and it does not meet the requirements for reduction and exemption.

Cases

2015Nu37299 Revocation of disposition rejecting capital gains tax rectification

Plaintiff and appellant

The AA

Defendant, Appellant

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the first instance court

Seoul Administrative Court 2014Gudan10076 ( February 4, 2015)

Conclusion of Pleadings

2015.03.03

Imposition of Judgment

2015.24

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant's refusal to rectify capital gains tax against the plaintiff on July 5, 201 X shall be revoked.

Reasons

The reason for the judgment of the first instance is reasonable, and therefore, Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, the main sentence of Article 420 of the

this judgment shall be quoted by reason of this judgment.

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed for lack of reason.

arrow