Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months of imprisonment with prison labor for an injury, etc. at the Daegu District Court on April 26, 2018 and two years of suspended sentence for the same year

5.4. The above judgment became final and conclusive.

[2018 Highest 2488]

1. On December 3, 2017, the Defendants violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) committed assault, such as putting a breath of the Victim D (29 years of age) and the victim’s conduct on the front line of Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, on the ground that the Defendants were committing the Defendants. Defendant B committed assault by putting a breath of the victim’s breath, and Defendant A committed a breath of the victim’s hair.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

2. The Defendant: (a) reported at the time, time, and place specified in paragraph (1) above that the assault case occurred; and (b) obstructed the Defendant by the police slope F, a police box affiliated with the Daegu Jung-gu Police Station E box called the scene; and (c) committed assault, such as f, f, f, f., f., f.s. f.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reports.

3. Defendant B attempted to assault D even after the police officer was called out at the date, time, and place mentioned in paragraph (1), and committed an assault, such as, in order to restrain the Defendant, the police officer affiliated with the police box of the Daegu Jung-gu Police Station E (hereinafter “Seoul Police Station”). Defendant B committed an assault by attaching flab to a clicker G with a blaps, and driving the breast by drinking, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reports.

[2018 Highest 3281] - No one may intermediate another's communications or provide it for another's communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator.

On December 2, 2017, the Defendant received a proposal from a person under whose name the Defendant would pay the mobile phone core chips on the face of the week. On the 27th day of the same month, the Defendant’s primary chips, such as the prepaid phone (H) opened in his name at the vicinity of the Daegu Northwest-gu, the Daegu Dong-gu, and the irregular chips on the 27th day of the same month.