logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.06.28 2017고단1466
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 5,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 피고인 A 피고인은 2017. 3. 11. 23:56 경 수원시 팔달구 C 빌딩 앞 도로에서, 피고인이 배우자와 말다툼을 하고 있다는 내용의 112 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 수원 중부 경찰서 D 파출소 소속 경장 E이 피고인을 제지하자, 위 E에게 “ 이 씨 발 짭새 새끼, 죽여 버릴라 ”라고 욕설을 하며 손으로 위 E의 머리카락을 잡아 흔들고, 주먹으로 위 E의 얼굴을 수 회 때리고, 발로 위 E의 배와 정강이를 수 회 걷어차고, 이에 옆에 있던 순경 F이 피고인을 현행범으로 체포하자, 발로 위 F의 배를 수 회 차는 등 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting processing duties.

2. Defendant B arrested Defendant B, at the above date, at the above time, and at the above place, the above F arrested Defendant B, who was the Defendant’s high school building, as a flagrant offender, and the above F assaulted Defendant B, by putting C above the back part of the police bom.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting processing duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on CDs of photographic records and CCTV video data taken by a police officer;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendants’ crime of this case, which was confirmed by the evidence of the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, is not very good in terms of the nature and circumstances of the crime in light of the motive of the police officers and the degree of violence against the police officers, the degree of the act’s clibity, etc.

However, the defendants' age, sex, and age of the defendants, such as the fact that the defendants became adult, the first criminal punishment after the coming of majority, and the confession and reflect of the crimes.

arrow