logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.09.19 2019나57220
토지인도 등
Text

1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The network E (hereinafter “the deceased”) is the father of the Plaintiff’s father, who was the representative of the D Class D clan (hereinafter “D”).

B. On May 16, 1979, the Plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the land listed in paragraph (1) of [Attachment 1] of the annexed Table 1 (hereinafter “the land listed in paragraph (1) of the annexed Table 1 (hereinafter “the land listed in paragraph (2) of this case”) due to each donation, with respect to the land listed in paragraph (1) of the annexed Table 1 (hereinafter “the land listed in paragraph (1) of the annexed Table 1 of this case”) (hereinafter “the land listed in paragraph (2) of 12,298 square meters from F forest land in Silung-si prior to the division”); hereinafter “the land listed in paragraph (2) of the annexed Table 1 of this case”).

C. In around 1990, the Deceased allowed the Defendant to occupy and use the instant land Nos. 1 and 2 in the vicinity of the seat of the said grave (hereinafter “each of the instant land”) in return for managing a clan grave.

Around 2004, the Deceased prepared a written confirmation to the Defendant that “The Defendant, as the mountain manager located in the FF in Silung-si, delegated the collection and use of the building rent on the instant land No. 2.” In addition, around October 2005, the Deceased made a document to the effect that “The deceased allowed the Defendant to reside free of charge on the ground that the said land was divided into H land at Silung-si (from 6,614 square meters before G, at Silung-si, at Silung-si, at the time of division).”

The Defendant, while occupying and using a lot of land of this case, installs each prefabricated building, vinyl house, and vain (hereinafter “instant building, etc.”) on each ground of the instant land listed in the separate sheet No. 1 attached hereto, and among them, set up a separate sheet No. 1 attached hereto. 1-A.

In the prefabricated-type building mentioned in the port, the defendant has been residing in the prefabricated-type building (the prefabricated-style building was removed and the defendant newly built the above building).

E. The Defendant leased the vinyl, vain, and prefabricated-type buildings listed in [Attachment 1 List 2] to other persons and received the rent.

F. On February 25, 2006, the Defendant: (a) on February 25, 2006, “the decedent’s forests and graveyards under his own return.”

arrow