logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2012.12.28 2012고단3535
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

The imprisonment without prison labor for the accused shall be determined by eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 14, 2012, at around 03:18, the Defendant driving a C-si and proceeded at a speed of 77 km per hour from the right side of the instant market to the right side of the instant market. The Defendant, at around 03:18, driven a C-si and proceeded at a speed of 77 km per hour from the right side of the instant market.

However, as a driver of a vehicle at night and with street lights kept, he had a duty of care to prevent accidents by properly manipulating the steering direction and brakes and properly manipulating the steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and is under the influence of alcohol on the front side of the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

The head part of the victim D(32 years of age) in order to cause the collision with the left part of the Defendant's driving vehicle, resulting in the victim's death with two cerebral bloods in the same place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. An autopsy report, a postmortem report, a weather information list, and a suitable inspection report;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. 범죄사실에 대한 해당법조와 형의 선택 교통사고처리특례법 제3조 제1항, 형법 제268조 [금고형 선택. 피해 결과가 무거운 점, 피고인이 2007년 동종 범죄로 집행유예를 선고받은 전력이 있는 점 등을 감안하여 위 형을 선택한다. 대법원 양형위원회가 공개한 양형기준에 의하면, 이 사건은 일반 교통사고 제2유형의 감경영역에 해당하여 권고형량범위는 금고 4월 ∽ 10월이고, 집행유예는 선택 가능한 경우이다. ]

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the Defendant reflects the truth in depth, that the taxi operated by the Defendant is covered by a comprehensive insurance and deposited KRW 5 million for the bereaved family members of the victim, that the Defendant is supported by his family after having been declared bankrupt and exempted from immunity around 2009, and that there is negligence of the victim in the occurrence of the accident.

arrow