logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
red_flag_2
(영문) 서울고등법원 2009. 6. 5. 선고 2009나10791 판결
[회생채권조사확정재판에대한이의][미간행]
Plaintiff (Withdrawal)

Plaintiff Limited Liability Company

Plaintiff Intervenor and Appellant

Intervenor Co., Ltd. (Attorney next-hwan, Counsel for the intervenor-appellant)

Defendant, Appellant

Defendant (Law Firm Jin, Attorney Lee Jae-in, Counsel for the defendant-appellant)

Conclusion of Pleadings

May 13, 2009

The first instance judgment

Seoul Central District Court Decision 2007Gahap82849 Decided December 18, 2008

Text

1. The plaintiff's successor's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff’s Intervenor.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The final claim inspection judgment of the Seoul Central District Court No. 2007Ma55 on August 10, 2007 shall be modified as follows. The rehabilitation claim of the plaintiff against the defendant corporation is 28,670,000 won and the final claim inspection judgment of the defendant corporation are finalized.

Reasons

The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, except where “ March 28, 2008” in Section 2 of Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance is “ March 25, 2008.” Thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The grounds alleged by the Plaintiff’s Intervenor are difficult to accept.

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the appeal.

Judges Jo Hee-de (Presiding Judge)

arrow