logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.08.20 2017가단5093983
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant's KRW 327,04,949, and KRW 4,00,000 to the plaintiff Eul, and KRW 2,00,00,00 to the plaintiff C, D, and E, respectively.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. A. At around 22:10 on June 17, 2015, G is the JLL car car at the front parking lot of H An apartment in the Namwon-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

) During the process of parking, the Plaintiff Company A, who followed the parking process on the front side of the Defendant Company, was shocked by the front driver of the Defendant Company (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) Due to the instant accident, Plaintiff A suffered from the injury, such as the blood transfusion from an external wound which has no two or more open addresses, the blood transfusion from an external wound which has no two or more open addresses, the blood transfusion from an external wound to an external wound, the pelle of the lower part of the base part of the (on the left part), the pelle of the side side of the (on the left part), the pelle of the (on the left part), the part of the (on the left part), the pelle of the (on the left part), etc.

3) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with the Defendant vehicle. 4) The Plaintiff B is the spouse of the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff C, D, and E are the children of the Plaintiff A.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's 1 through 6, Eul's 1 and 2 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident in this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle, unless there are special circumstances, since the plaintiff A was injured due to the operation of the defendant vehicle.

The defendant asserts that the plaintiff A is not liable for damages since the agreement on the action and the exemption are not effective to the defendant, who is jointly and severally liable. The defendant asserts that the plaintiff A is not liable for damages because the agreement on the action and the exemption are not effective to the defendant.

If a letter of agreement is signed and sealed by a civil or criminal lawsuit or any objection that the victim of a traffic accident would not raise any objection while receiving the agreed amount, the extent of the damage, educational background of the victim, relationship between the victim and the perpetrator, shall be the agreement.

arrow