1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 94,220,602 to Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 2,000,000 to Plaintiff B; and (c) from June 1, 2017 to each of the said money.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. At around 22:52 on April 25, 2015, D, in the case of the Doma-dong, Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, the Doma-dong-gu Office of the United States Armed Forces (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant vehicle”). D, in the case of the Doma-dong-dong, the Doma-do Office

) While driving the Plaintiff, while driving the Plaintiff, has four-lanes in front of the road and there is no intersection, crossing the said four-lanes across the center line, and having driven from the opposite lane to the port at the right side of the Defendant’s moving direction, the part behind the left side of the Plaintiff A’s Daejeon Flauna taxi, which driven from the opposite lane to the port, was received as the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle had the vehicle on the right side of the road off a chain due to the said shock (hereinafter “instant accident”).

The circumstances at the time of the accident refer to the “accident site map.” As a result, Plaintiff A suffered injury, such as blood transfusion and scarkeing scarke, etc., due to the absence of two or more open wounds. (2) Plaintiff A was hospitalized and provided outpatient treatment from April 25, 2015 to May 31, 2017. In accordance with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, Plaintiff A was provided with KRW 24,138,560 for temporary layoff benefits, medical care benefits, 2,284,310 for disability benefits, and KRW 9,060,220 for disability benefits, according to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act.

3) Plaintiff B is his father and wife, and the Defendant is the insurer who concluded the comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle. [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 7, and 11 (which has a serial number) and the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments.

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant, who is the insurer of the defendant vehicle, is liable to compensate for damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident in this case, since the plaintiff sustained an injury due to the operation of the defendant vehicle

2. In addition to the scope of compensation for damage, the same item shall be the same as each corresponding item of the attached Table of the calculation of damages, and the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than monthly and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.