logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.05.07 2015고정67
모욕
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 19, 2014, at around 23:20, the Defendant began from the bus stops of 577 new-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government on September 23:46 on the same day, and requested the victim D, who was seated in front of the 363 small-scale, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, to keep his arms from approaching the bus at around 363:46 on the same day, and made a public insult of the victim on the ground that approximately 20 passengers hear, and that the victim D, who was seated in front of the 363 small-scale, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, demanded approximately 20 passengers not to contact the arms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of D and E;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A report on each investigation, and a photograph by cutting down CCTV images inside a bus;

1. Although the defendant and his defense counsel denied the facts charged that the defendant had no desire for the victim, the defendant and his defense counsel consistently stated that the victim was damaged by the defendant since the police and consistently from this court to this court, i.e., the following circumstances that are recognized as having been comprehensively adopted and investigated by this court, and that the victim stated in detail that it is difficult for the defendant to do so without direct experience, such as the words, actions, surrounding circumstances, etc. at the time of the time, and thus, the credibility of the statement is determined. The F that used the bus at the scene also stated in the statement of the victim in compliance with the victim's statement at this court, and each of the above evidence is found to have been found. Thus, the defendant and his defense counsel's above assertion cannot be accepted, since it

Application of Statutes

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow