(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.05.26 2014고정933

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.05.26 2014고정933

모욕

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 19:00 on May 11, 2014, the Defendant made a public insult of the victim by openly referring to the victim D (67 years of age, women) who is the victim and the head of the group of apartment security guards in front of the Seocho-gu Office 114 Dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City guard room, and the head of the group of apartment security guards in front of the 7-8 apartment security guards and apartment residents.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Each investigation report [The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant had no desire for the victim, but all the following circumstances, namely, the victim has consistently made a statement that he had suffered damage from the defendant since this court was lawfully adopted and investigated by this court, that is, the victim has consistently made a statement from this court to this court, and that it is difficult for the defendant to make a statement by specifically memorying the horses, actions, surrounding circumstances, etc. at the time, and that it is difficult for him to do not directly experience, and therefore, the credibility of the statement is judged to exist; E at the time of the statement in compliance with the victim's statement in this court; and considering each of the above evidence, E at the time of the statement in compliance with the victim's statement in this court, each of the above evidence is found to have

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014).

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, including the fact that the defendant, as at the time of taking a bath from the victim, may be considered in light of the age, character and conduct of the defendant, circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as per the order.

참조조문

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.05.07 2015고정67

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.06.18 2015고단922

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.05.26 2015고단235

-서울남부지방법원 2018.10.19 2017노1966

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.07.24 2020고정364