Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 02:20 on January 2, 2019, the Defendant, at the Public Notice Board in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, brought a dispute with C residing in the same Public Notice Board on the day immediately preceding the night, set up three guns to be cut off due to the suspension of the bruma, put them into a throwter, and tried to burns the area through the window on the hallway, but the suspended items, which were laid away from the floor floor of the above Public Notice Board, were destroyed by only a part of the floor, and were not carried out on the wind which was cut down by fire.

Accordingly, the defendant was trying to fire a structure that many people use as a residence by setting fire, such as C, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Investigation report (report on the inspection of actual business trip at the scene of fire-prevention activities);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing photographing places of occurrence;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 174 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Article 25 (2) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of attempted crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act is deemed to have been committed in the heading room where C resides, attaching three articles to be laid down due to a small dispute with C and its public notice source, which the Defendant was in possession of the Defendant. Considering that the method and content of the crime, in particular, the place where the crime was committed was committed, and that there was a situation where many people living in a large number of people and the place of the crime was vulnerable to fire, which could have caused a large number of people’s damage.

Considering this point, it is necessary to impose strict liability on the accused.

However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected it.

In addition, there is no large size in which the defendant puts a fire, and thus, there is no particular property and human life damage after extinguishing only part of the board of the Gowon floor and extinguishing it at a low level.