logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.06.21 2019고단1301
현주건조물방화예비
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Seized evidence 1 or 2 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was a person who resides in the D public announcement source of the operation of the C in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 2, and the same public announcement source resident was born with the above public announcement source on the ground that the same public announcement source resident disregards the Defendant.

At around 16:20 on April 26, 2019, the Defendant purchased 1L from the steel store located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E, and attached the d public announcement source entrance and stairs with a stringer with a stringer, and attached the stringer with a stringer, but there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge the part of the indictment in the instant case “if there was another stringer with a stringer who would not attach a stringer,” this part of the facts charged was deleted and revised as above. This part of the facts charged was not likely to result in the commencement of fire prevention on the wind arrested by the police officer dispatched after receiving a report from the resident F of the d public announcement source.

Accordingly, the defendant was prepared for the purpose of harming a building in which people exist.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Each investigation report (number 7 through 10);

1. Each of the Defendant and his defense counsel denied all of the crimes of this case by asserting that there was no mind about the fire in the Notification Board of this case, and that there was no laz with the laz with the laz with the laz, but the following circumstances acknowledged by each of the aforementioned evidence are as follows. In other words, the Defendant purchased one stoper from the iron shop that is located in the vicinity of his debit card and then spread it to the stairs, etc. of the Notification Board of this case, and ② the Defendant purchased one stopner from the Prosecutor’s office, and then spread it to the corridor and stairs of the Notification Board of this case.

Among the persons who reside in the instant Notice Board, there was a person who thought that the usual system would not be good, but tried to drink and sleep on the day of the instant case.

arrow