1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the following dismissal or addition, and therefore, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Under the fifth sentence of the first instance court, the second sentence "9,60,000 won (2,40,000 won per day operating profit x 4 days)" is "7,569,264 won (1,892,316 won per day operating profit x 4 days x 4 days, and the plaintiff reduced the amount of daily operating profit x 1,892,316, but did not reduce the purport of the claim)."

Part 6 of the judgment of the first instance court provides that "Nos. 4, 5, 8, and 10 of the A" shall be deemed as "Evidence Nos. 4, 5, 8, 10, 14, and 15 of the A," "this court" as "the court of the first instance", "Witness G of the first instance court" as "the witness G of the first instance court", and "the result of the verification of USB image of the first instance court on June 30, 2015" as "the result of the verification of USB video of the first instance court on June 30, 2015 (Evidence No. 9)".

After the 6th page 12 of the judgment of the first instance court, “the result of verification” is added to “the result of verification of USB video (Evidence A No. 12) on June 21, 2016.”

Considering that the last 7th decision of the first instance court is required “the fact that the contract would have been required”, it would have not been concluded on the sales amount of the instant purchase price for the cancer sales contract.

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.