logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.04.17 2014고단1126
영유아보육법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

The Defendant is the director of the “D” childcare center in the broad name city C, and E is the original director of the above childcare center, and F is the son of the above E, and G and H are the parents who registered infants in the above childcare center as their original students.

Criminal facts

No person shall receive any subsidy that is paid under the Infant Care Act by fraud or other improper means.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received a total of KRW 21,932,270 by unlawful means as follows.

1. Illegal receipt of subsidies related to infant care teachers;

A. On April 2013, from around May 2013 to May 2013, the Defendant was granted subsidies of KRW 2,400,000 in total twice during the same period, by falsely registering the Plaintiff, who was an infant care teacher, connected with the infant care information system, as a monthly salary extension teacher, and then registered the Plaintiff, who was an infant care teacher, as a child care teacher, as a monthly salary extension teacher.

B. On March 2013, at a place where the place is unknown, the Defendant received the F-related subsidy for infant care teachers: (a) requested that E receive the subsidy by registering a false infant care teacher; (b) obtained the Defendant F’s permission; and (c) received the certificate of infant care teacher qualification from the above F; and (d) delivered it to the Defendant.

Then, from April 2013 to May 2013, the Defendant received a total of KRW 1,243,150 for two times during the same period by accessing the childcare information system, and by falsely registering F, other than the childcare teachers, as infant care teachers, at the above “D” childcare center on two occasions from around May 2013 to by granting KRW 660,000.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with E and F, received subsidies by illegal means.

C. The Defendant wrongfully received subsidies related to infant care teachers from April 2013 to May 2013 (hereinafter “D”) with access to the aforementioned “D” child care center and to the infant care information system.

arrow