logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2019.05.17 2019고단87
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On June 27, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six years of imprisonment by the Gwangju High Court for a crime of intrusion upon residence or a crime of bodily injury, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Ganpo Prison on December 22, 2018.

[Criminal facts]

1. Fraud;

A. On December 24, 2018, around 00:24, the Defendant used the said taxi to the front of the correctional institution in front of the day in front of the Eup in the Yannam-gun, Seoul-do, by getting on the D taxi operated by the victim C, who is a taxi engineer, in front of the Yan-si building B.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay taxi expenses even if he uses the taxi of the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and being provided with the taxi driving service equivalent to 50,000 won from the victim, acquired economic benefits equivalent to the same amount.

B. At around 01:40 on January 25, 2019, the Defendant: (a) boarded the H taxi operated by the victim G, who is a taxi engineer in front of the F in Wood-si; and (b) used the said taxi to I of the Gun in the south-do.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay taxi expenses even if he uses the taxi of the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and being provided with taxi driving service equivalent to 15,000 won from the victim, acquired economic benefits equivalent to the same amount.

C. On January 27, 2019, around 07:17, the Defendant: (a) boarded the victim L, a taxi engineer, in front of the K cafeteria located in the Gampo CityJ; and (b) used the said taxi to the O located in N in the Gun located in the Southern-gun of the Republic of Korea.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay taxi expenses even if he uses the taxi of the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and being provided with taxi driving service equivalent to 15,000 won from the victim, acquired economic benefits equivalent to the same amount.

2. Interference with business;

A. On January 1, 2019, the Defendant transferred around 12:00.

arrow