logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.06.12 2017고단2716
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 2716"

1. On September 22, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “the Defendant would pay KRW 500,000 to the taxi fare per day on the 1st day of the week, a day by burning to the victim D, who is a personal taxi engineer, at a place where around September 22, 2016 could not be known.”

However, the defendant did not have any specific means to pay the same amount of cash or money of KRW 500,000 in the number, so even if the victim uses a taxi operated, he/she did not have the intent to pay the taxi fee.

Defendant deceiving the victim as above and acquired financial benefits equivalent to the same amount as the market price provided from around 10:00 on September 23, 2016 to around 23:00 on September 23, 2016.

2. On September 29, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “Around September 29, 2016, the Defendant would pay KRW 500,000 to the taxi fare per day on the 1st day of the week,” by phoneing to the said victim at a place where around 07:00,000 cannot be known.”

However, the defendant did not have any specific means to pay the same amount of cash or money of KRW 500,000 in the number, so even if the victim uses a taxi operated, he/she did not have the intent to pay the taxi fee.

Defendant deceptioned the victim as above and acquired financial benefits equivalent to the same amount as the market price provided from 08:00 to 23:00 on the same day from 08:00 to 23:00 on the same day by deceiving the victim.

Defendant A, “The 2017 Highest 3483,” has been working as a professor of the Music University in the People’s Republic of China, who operates the instant female clothes, “F,” in Lldong E, and Defendant B has limited the status of the president of the H Association. Defendant B has neglected I’s status as the president of the H Association, and knew the victim, and is money from the victim.

arrow