beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,00, and by fine of KRW 3,000,000, respectively.
The defendants are the defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendants’ co-principal E is a pastor of the G church located in F at Mapopo City. Defendant B, Defendant A, and Defendant C are the believers of the said church, and around June 26, 2015, the said G church was prohibited from entering and departing from E and the Defendants at the H church meeting in dispute with the said G church. As such, the Defendants were willing to complete a new wall and resist to enter and depart from the H church.
around 08:10 on June 26, 2015, Defendants and E entering the church entrance at the above G D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D, respectively, and the Defendant C, in advance, opened the entrance of the church by inserting the lock lock door of the above church, E, Defendant A entered the church through the open door, and Defendant B returned to the outside toilet of the above church after the said church, opened a toilet door and entered the church through the toilet.
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with E and intruded the above building against the victim J will.
B. Defendants and E interfere with their duties enter a church in the same manner as the date, time, place, and the manner described in the above paragraph (a), E, Defendant C, and Defendant A occupy the distribution of weddings, and Defendant B did not have the entrance doors of the church offices.
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with E and interfered with the management of the church, such as preparation of the victim J church worship, by force.
2. Defendant C’s damage to property was caused by opening a hivers for the entrance of the church entrance in order to cover the decline between preparation and preparation at the time, place, and place set forth in paragraph (1) of Article 1, in order to damage the locking devices equivalent to KRW 50,00,000 at the market price of the victim’s H.
3. Defendant B’s damage to property shall be the sum of the market prices owned by the victim HH church owned by Defendant B, using the Do governor who entered the church as the date, time, place, and method described in the first paragraph (a) after entering the church, and using the Do governor who was in the warehouse of the church.