A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 29, 2016, the Defendant, from around 20:30 on August 29, 2016, 200 to about 20 minutes, performed a bath to the following: (a) the Defendant, while drinking at a D cafeteria operated by the victim C, he saw three customers to sit on the table; and (b) the Defendant and the victim saw to take a bath in the large interest of “Wel gly, walthly, wal”.

Then, the Defendant 21:28 on the same day and found again in the above restaurant, and caused the Defendant’s failure to open the doors that the victim corrected due to the Defendant’s failure, etc., and continued to visit the above restaurant at around 23:25 on the same day, and she saw the victim to take a bath, such as “Ie son”, “Ie son.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to hear statements by victim C telephone);

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (the sentence shall be determined as ordered within the scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines (the mitigated area: between eight months) in consideration of the fact that the injured person does not want punishment, but has the criminal records of the same kind of crime against the accused);