logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 01. 28. 선고 2015두55394 판결
(심리불속행) 거래사실이 없음에도 거짓 전표작성 등을 통해 가공원가를 계상한 행위는 ‘부당과소신고가산세’ 적용대상임[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2015-Nu-39783 ( October 06, 2015)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho High-2014-Seoul Government-039 (2014.05)

Title

(In the absence of fact-finding) In the absence of fact-finding transactions, the act of calculating a provisional park by making false slips is subject to the application of the penalty tax for unfair underreporting.

Summary

(In the absence of the substance of the transaction, the virtual park is omitted from corporate tax by appropriating the virtual park through the preparation of false slips. It falls under §27 ②(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the National flag Act and thus is subject to "unfair under-reported additional tax."

Related statutes

Article 47-2 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Cases

2015Du55394 Revocation of Disposition of Corporate Tax Imposition

Plaintiff-Appellant

OOOOO Co.

Defendant-Appellee

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2015Nu39783 Decided October 06, 2015

Imposition of Judgment

. 28, 2016

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

arrow