Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

, however, the defendant from the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

피고인들은 2011. 10.경 서울 구로구 C 301호에 있는 피고인 B의 사무실에서 동두천시장 명의의 공문서인 건축대수선용도변경허가서를 위조한 다음 이를 이용하여 샷시업자 D와 동두천시 E 공사의 대가로 동두천시 F에 대한 외상공사를 계약하기로 공모하였다.

1. Defendant A, who counterfeited public document, had tamp the phrases written to Defendant B in the license column, requested Defendant B to print them. After printing the necessary phrases and printing them, Defendant A, who had the official seal of the 201-Housing and the New Construction Permit-213, Defendant A copied the official seal of the same 201-Si, Gyeonggi-do in the site location column, “235.00, Gyeonggi-do in the site area column, “E Urban Residential Housing (G),” “140.15,” “59.64,” “480.19” in the building area column, “204.34, and “480.19” in the total floor area column, and “204.34,” and “480.19,” respectively.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to forge the permission for the construction, substantial repair, and change of the name in the name of the same ducheon Market.

2. 위조공문서행사 피고인 A은 2011. 11.경 불상의 장소에서 위와 같이 위조한 건축ㆍ대수선ㆍ용도변경허가서를 위 허가서가 위조되었다는 정을 모르는 샷시업자 D에게 제시하여 이를 행사하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. A copy of a forged official document, or a permit for the alteration of the purpose of use;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigative reports (verification as to whether a permit for construction, substantial repair, and alteration of use is issued);

1. The Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Articles 225, 30, 229, 225, and 30 of the Criminal Act; and

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;